Who is financing TotalEnergies?
Banks and investors provide TotalEnergies, and other energy companies, with financial supports that are essential to maintaining operations and developing new activities.
Despite the urgent need to redirect financial support to sustainable energy, energy efficiency and the development of a more sustainable energy sector, financial players continue to fuel oil and gas expansion as can be seen from TotalEnergies.
Banks supporting TotalEnergies
TotalEnergies’ top 10 banks (2021-2024)
In US$ millions
Source: Analysis by Reclaim Finance, based on data from the Banking on Climate Chaos 2025 report.
Banks’ support for TotalEnergies can be through loans – to its fossil fuel projects or to the company – or by helping it issue bonds or shares.
22 banks provided US$21.8 billion to TotalEnergies between 2021 and 2024.
Where are the banks that finance TotalEnergies based?

France
(29%)
US$ 6,291 mln

USA
(23%)
US$ 4,959 mln

Japan
(16%)
US$ 3,546 mln

UK
(14%)
US$ 3,134 mln

Spain
(8%)
US$ 1,645 mln

Germany
(5%)
US$ 1,190 mln

Canada
(3%)
US$ 749 mln

Italy
(1%)
US$ 197 mln

Australia
(0.5%)
US$ 104 mln
Are banks taking action against TotalEnergies’ climate-wrecking strategy?
Only a few banks, such as Banque Postale or Danske Bank, have chosen to completely exclude financing to companies – such as TotalEnergies – which are pursuing an oil and gas expansion strategy that goes against the recommendations of scientists and the International Energy Agency.
Only a few of the banks which have financed TotalEnergies over the past 3 years have adopted measures to reduce their financing to the fossil fuel industry. And even these measures are generally inadequate. While they may exclude direct financing for oil and gas projects, they continue to allow financing for oil and gas companies. Furthermore, they only exclude some parts of the fossil fuel production chain, meaning they can still finance midstream infrastructure such as gas liquefaction terminals. Banks also include exceptions intended to make their policies flexible.
| Commitment to no longer finance oil and gas companies |
|---|
| None of the banks that have financed TotalEnergies since 2021 has ruled out financing companies with a climate-wrecking oil and gas expansion strategy. |
| Commitment to no longer finance any oil or gas project |
|---|
| None of the banks that have financed TotalEnergies since 2021 has ruled out direct financing for any sort of oil or gas project (including “midstream” projects such as gas liquefaction plants). |
| Partial restrictions on support to oil and gas projects |
|---|
|
| No or few restrictions |
|---|
|
Investors supporting TotalEnergies
TotalEnergies’ top 15 investors
In US$ billion
*Credit Agricole Group : includes Amundi, CPR AM, Banque Degroof Petercam, Degroof Petercam AM, CA Indosuez, KBI Global Investors and shares of Fonds Communs de Placement d’Entreprise (FCPE) of TotalEnergies, managed par Amundi.
**Deutsche Bank : includes DWS.
The 15 largest investors in TotalEnergies held at least** 81 billion US$ in investments in the company as of April 23, 2026.
**Financial markets transparency rules mean it is not possible to know the entire amounts owned by investors.
Top 10 countries where TotalEnergies’ main investors are based***

USA****
US$76.1 bln

France****
US$25.5 bln

Germany
US$8.1 bln

UK
US$7.1 bln

Canada
US$3 bln

Switzerland
US$2.9 bln

Norway
US$2.5 bln

Italy
US$1.4 bln

Spain
US$1.3 bln

Luxembourg
US$1.3 bln
***Sources: Analysis by Reclaim Finance, based on data from the Bloomberg terminal on April 23, 2026. Contact us for more details about these countries or other countries.
**** Download the list of the 20 main investors in United States of America and in France.
WHICH INVESTORS OPPOSE TOTALENERGIES’ CLIMATE-WRECKING STRATEGY
Engaging without impact
For many years, investors – such as the French Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, Danish APF, British Federated Hermes and Dutch Robeco – have claimed to convince TotalEnergies to adopt a transition strategy aligned with the Paris Agreement. As the company regularly raises its oil and gas production targets, reduces its investments in sustainable energies and has since 2025 refused to have its shareholders vote on its climate plan, it is clear that this dialogue strategy has failed.
Case-by-case exclusion
Several investors have therefore chosen to exclude TotalEnergies from their investments because of its impacts on climate or human rights. This is the case of the Dutch MN, which, after coordinating the Climate Action 100+ investor dialogue with TotalEnergies for several years, excluded TotalEnergies from its investment portfolio in 2024 and denounced ” years of intensive, yet unsuccessful, climate engagement”. Danish PKA sold its investment in TotalEnergies because of the EACOP project in Uganda, explaining: “we had been in dialogue for a number of years, without them being responsive to the criticism we had made.”
Divestment from all oil and gas companies
Since the Paris Agreement, investors such as the sovereign wealth fund Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, Ircantec in France and ABP (the largest Dutch pension fund) have announced that they are excluding all companies that develop oil and gas projects from their investments. However, this strategy does not allow them to sanction these companies at their Annual General Meetings.
Halting new investment in all oil and gas companies and sanctioning them
Investors such as French CNP Assurances have adopted policies that exclude any new investment in companies that, like TotalEnergies, develop new oil and gas fields, while keeping them in their portfolios. This allows them to keep their shareholder power to sanction the leadership of these companies at their annual general meetings, by voting against the re-election of the members of its board of directors, the remuneration of executives or the approval of the financial statements.
Ambition of the oil and gas investor strategy:
| No strategy or very weak strategy |
|---|
| Did not commit to stop new investments in oil and gas developers and did not publish votes against TotalEnergies' climate-wrecking strategy in 2025 |
* Federated Hermes, PFA and Robeco coordinate the Climate Action 100+ investor dialogue with the company |
| Limited strategy |
|---|
| Excludes all or some new investments in oil and gas developers. Or voted in 2025 against TotalEnergies climate-wrecking strategy and published its votes. |
|
| Ambitious strategy |
|---|
| Exclusion of all or a majority of oil and gas companies, including TotalEnergies, from the investment portfolio. Or excludes new investments (shares and bonds) in oil and gas companies, including TotalEnergies, and voted in 2025 against TotalEnergies climate-wrecking strategy and published its votes. |
Source: Reclaim Finance, Oil and Gas Policy Tracker, Which investors refuse to support TotalEnergies?, TotalEnergies: the shareholders who voted for climate backsliding in 2025 |
Main financing of TotalEnergies projects
Sources: Analysis by Reclaim Finance, based on data from the Banking on Climate Chaos 2024 report and financial data extracted from the Bloomberg terminal on March 13, 2024.

to learn more
Banking on Climate Chaos (2024): annual report on the 60 largest international banks of the fossil fuel industry. Read more
Oil and Gas Policy Tracker: assessment of financial institutions’ oil and gas policies. Read more
Assessment of TotalEnergies’ Climate Strategy (2024): Analysis of the company’s climate strategy by 2030, based on the evaluation of its investment strategy, its fossil production plan and its diversification plan. Read more
The Bond Market, A cash cow for TotalEnergies’ climate-wrecking projects (2024): briefing the financial institutions that support TotalEnergies through bonds. Read more
Call for a radical shift in engaging oil and gas companies on climate strategy (2024): open letter calling on 50 major investors to radically shift their relationships with oil and gas companies on climate issues. Read more




































